Tuesday, 29 July 2008
Injury - water off a duck's back
Most of us know that it is hard running a local authority and can admit a little indulgence. The big government piles more and more b*llsh1t on the little government, and gives them all the sh1tty jobs - like a junior partner in a law firm (read any John Grisham novel for details).
So when we bounce along the neglected country lanes, with their ruts and overgrown hedges, their floods and debris from blocked culverts, we reflect on the damage being done to our vehicles and rejoice at this ingenious way of supporting the local economy. My mate the garage man explained how it works. Somerset garages gain a valuable source of income from the thousands of people that have to get their suspension, tyres, windscreens and so on replaced prematurely. We may not have our own automotive industry, but the labour costs go straight into the hands of local people.
To some extent this is also an excellent voluntary tax on the an*lly retentive. We all have to get through the MOT, but apparently some people (called "townies") even go in to get scratches fixed when they've had close encounters with overgrown hawthorn. Unbelievable!
Some people were "injured" on the A37 last year, because they were too busy reading all the signs the County Council had put up about road safety to notice what was going on around them, and ended up in the overgrown ditches (more excellent news for the local vehicle repair industry). These road safety signs were a subject of much discussion down at our local. For example, some of them gave interesting statistics about the number of people killed and injured on the A37, either general numbers - for the whole road, or specific numbers - for upcoming features such as the bends between Yeovil and Shepton. We in Somerset are a pretty numerate bunch, it must be said, and spend a lot of time looking at and thinking about all the different numbers on the Council's signs.
One series of signs proclaimed "Road Safety Improvements Planned for 2007". They became more and more controversial as the year drew to a close and speculation mounted as to what the Council would do when 2008 arrived. One faction maintained that they would paint an "8" over the "7" and leave the signs up, while a second faction suggested that money would be saved by painting a "9" over the "7". Then a third faction came to the bar, claiming that the Council was planning to pay a private contractor to go out on New Year's Eve and take down ALL the signs. The improvement to Road Safety would be immediate and obvious, as drivers would have a hundred less excuses for not concentrating on the road.
The County Council is also responsible for a number of other services (Education, Social Work, Library Fines etc.) and many of us have also suffered "injury" at the hands of these too. But we take it all with good grace, with rolling eyeballs and expressions like "'tis bureacracy gone mad!" and "gotta do another form for county". Like I say, water off a duck's back!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
A friend from Belgium was deeply troubled by these very same signs you mention which I have to agree distract & dazzle the road user something rotten. However he was impressed that our esteemed Road Safety Unit is so well financed that it can afford such a profusion of road signs.Perhaps they should share their riches with road maintenance?
Don't you yokels have anything better to do than read roadsigns?
Post a Comment